Quantcast The Hawk
College Media Network

Current Issue:

Scandal surrounds Aramark

Mark Maher '08

Issue date: 4/2/08 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
Students check out in the Crimson Cafe.
Students check out in the Crimson Cafe.

Across the nation, coalitions of students, workers, and their allies have been protesting large-scale food service company, Aramark, over allegations that it has been mistreating workers committing fraud and providing low quality food. The protestors' primary concerns are borne of a string of incidents that suggest that Aramark has been less-than-vigorous in meeting service goals.

As an example of the types of allegations that have been brought against the company, an investigation found that, at the Los Alamos National Laboratory's cafeteria, Aramark had withheld back-pay and fringe wages, and had failed to pay some workers for lunch hours. As a result of the investigation, Aramark was forced to pay out over $100,000.

A food service worker in Michigan was apparently fired for reporting on unsanitary conditions, including rat droppings and mice in refrigerators. There were no other indications of misconduct or discipline on the part of the worker.

Besides specific examples, jobs with Aramark constitute more than half of Forbes' 2007 listing of the 25 lowest paying jobs in the country. Because of these incidents, as well as allegations that Aramark is guilty of age and gender discrimination and complaints brought by the National Labor Committee from many regions of the country, a rally was held last November in front of Aramark headquarters in Philadelphia. Since then, at least 25 of workers involved with the rally have been disciplined, demoted or fired.

Aside from worker mistreatment, many claim that Aramark is guilty of fraud, overbilling and driving up the deficits of the organizations with which Aramark works. In 2004, Aramark was forced to pay more than $3 million over allegations that they had accepted donations from the USDA without reducing the amount that the school district was charged. Even after paying such an exorbitant amount to settle, Aramark still claims that no laws were broken.

According to the Houston Chronicle, Aramark had inflated the number of free meals offered to children within the Houston Independent School District, which meant that the district was forced to pay over $200,000 as a penalty to the state.

Philadelphia's school districts terminated their contract with Aramark only two years into a five year contract. Aramark had promised to help eliminate the deficit that the school district was running. Instead, after one year, the deficit jumped to $4 million and $7 million after two years - an increase of 72 percent. Furthermore, students from across the country have complained of exorbitant prices. Arizona State University recently signed a contract with Aramark, who will increase the price that students must pay for the least expensive meal plan by $650 to $1500 and is not giving the university the opportunity to opt-out.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 5 of 6

Marge

posted 4/02/08 @ 11:31 AM EST

My child's meal plan ran out of money is early November, I never investigated, I wonder if there was a fraud.

Fr. Benjamin J. Urmston, S.J.

posted 4/03/08 @ 2:31 PM EST

Do you think this article has been well-enough researched for Xavier U. to use it as we consider contracting Aramark as our food service provider? Aramark has submitted a bid. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Marg

posted 4/03/08 @ 3:20 PM EST

Fraud and Aramark are synonomous...one needs only to look at it's stock offerings to the public and its various interests, private, public, and private again. (Continued…)

daxson motis

posted 4/14/08 @ 1:25 AM EST

What matters is that this company should not be serving humans food let alone even dogs. Im a student who is forced to pay 2500 bucks a semester to eat that crap. (Continued…)

whittington

posted 8/09/08 @ 5:30 PM EST

I worked for Aramark here in florida,As far as I know, I still work there,Fiiday I was supended for no cheese in the potatoes,I know there is another reason, in july I was assaulted in front of another coworker,she did nothing, called no guard, as this is in a prison, nothing was done after this ,Aramark tried to push it under the carpet, Then as I said supened me for no cheese in potatoes, this is a very unfair company, treats employees like crap. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

Who had the best week ever?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement